Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
Volume 32, Issue 6 , Pages 41-49, 15 March 2010

Code Sepsis: Rapid Methods To Diagnose Sepsis and Detect Hematopathogens:

Part II: Challenges to the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sepsis

  • Donna M. Wolk, MHA, Ph.D., D(ABMM)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationMailing address: Donna M. Wolk, MHA, Ph.D., D(ABMM), Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., P.O. Box 245059, Tucson, AZ 85724-5059. Tel.: 520-626-3676. Fax:520-694-7329
  • ,
  • Albert B. Fiorello, M.D.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Abstract 

Bloodstream infections and sepsis are among the top causes of mortality in the United States, killing nearly 600 people per day. Many septic patients are treated in emergency medicine departments or critical care units, settings in which rapid administration of targeted antibiotic therapy drastically reduces mortality. Unfortunately, current microbiology laboratory methods are too slow to support rapid interventions, typically requiring >24 hours to detect the presence of bloodstream pathogens (hematopathogens) and at least 3 to 5 days to confirm the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Moreover, cultures from septic patients are often falsely negative due to pre-emptive therapy, the presence of fastidious organisms, or microbes that are present in low density. As a result, empiric, broad-spectrum treatment is common, a costly approach that may fail to effectively target the correct microbe, may inadvertently harm patients via antimicrobial toxicity, and may contribute to the evolution of drug-resistant microbes. Clearly, new rapid laboratory methods, which enhance laboratory capabilities to diagnose bloodstream infections, will be a useful and welcome addition to clinical microbiology laboratories.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Editor's Note: Part I of this article appeared in the March 1, 2010 issue of CMN, Volume 32, Number 5.

PII: S0196-4399(10)00010-3

doi:10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2010.03.001

Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
Volume 32, Issue 6 , Pages 41-49, 15 March 2010